lowrance X102c
wanna know
Posted 2/23/2009 4:03 PM (#77955)
Subject: lowrance X102c


Can i ask your opinion on the lowrance X102C is this a good locator found one for $350.00 is this unit worth the price or is this unit too out dated thks for your help
Top of the page Bottom of the page
GNWC Rookie
Posted 2/23/2009 4:22 PM (#77957 - in reply to #77955)
Subject: RE: lowrance X102c


Member

Posts: 625

Location: LaCrosse, WI
The 102C was a very good unit for Lowrance. It's the same as the 332C and 334C (just without the GPS). For $399 at Cabelas you can get the sonar only version of the 510C which is the newer model. I think I would spend the extra $50 to get 3 year newer technology.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Purple Skeeter
Posted 2/23/2009 6:34 PM (#77966 - in reply to #77955)
Subject: RE: lowrance X102c


Member

Posts: 885

I agree with Marshall... nice unit, I had one for 3 years, never failed.  I would also spend an extra $150 and get the newer version with the GPS.

 http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/product/standard-item.jsp?_DARGS=/cabelas/en/common/catalog/item-link.jsp_A&_DAV=MainCatcat20166-cat602012_TGP&id=0044762019021a&navCount=2&podId=0044762&parentId=cat602012&masterpathid=&navAction=push&catalogCode=9IS&rid=&parentType=index&indexId=cat602012&hasJS=true

Dominic

Top of the page Bottom of the page
stacker
Posted 2/24/2009 1:10 PM (#77996 - in reply to #77966)
Subject: RE: lowrance X102c


Member

Posts: 2445

Location: Fremont, Wisconsin
I myself would not buy the 102 for 350.00 thats about 150 to much. Spend the 50 and get the 510C. Also, save for the added IGPS unit as a stand alone. If you split the screen on the 510 it is so small itsimpossible to read in bumpy conditions. I would not have a split screen unit unless it was 10inch screen.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
K Gonefishin
Posted 2/25/2009 8:01 AM (#78027 - in reply to #77955)
Subject: Re: lowrance X102c


Member

Posts: 80

Location: Lake Erie
Gander Mountain was selling 102c's for 399 brand new a couple years ago, 350 is too much.
Top of the page Bottom of the page