|
|
Member
Posts: 859
Location: Appleton wi | Anyone get there entry confirmed yet? |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 378
Location: Omro,Wi. | GOT MINE TODAY!! TEAM 228 Snappin Mel and I are going to be there  |
|
| |
|
| I got my today team 271 good luck guys  |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 617
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin | boat 37.... |
|
| |
|
| BOAT 58. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 874
Location: Neenah, WI | 273 here |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 85
| 233 |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 1656
| 288......cloes enough behind Dale we'll be able to follow him |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 2393
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin | Team 40
Watch my wake.............again Dale
Bet you're just dying to know how someone from the Milwaukee area can get such a low number? |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 105
| Team 148 Kitch |
|
| |
|
| Does anyone know how many teams are in it this year?
team #169 |
|
| |
|
| As an approximation, the first 75 numbers and the final 75 numbers "fish alone" for a period on each day......I'd take either. Recall order reverses on day two. Also curious how many they took this year. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 1656
| Number I heard, was 330+. + would be the teams that postmarked on the 1st but didn't get there early. there's a couple teams from MN and such that they figured it would go up a couple of boats. |
|
| |
|
| So much for "300+10" Wonder how big they're going to let this thing get? Anyone know of any other "major" walleye tourney that takes as many entries? Any thoughts on whether there needs to be a hard cap, and how that cap could be implemented if necessary? |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 859
Location: Appleton wi | Got mine yesterday also! whee ha............Team #305
Edited by eye Lunker 3/15/2005 4:03 PM
|
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 1656
| xxl, personally I don't have an issue with the size of the tourney even if it would get larger. But Otter Street would like to keep the size in check. I was told if it got much larger than last years (343 boats) that they were going to take returning team preference. meaning that new teams might not get in. This doesn't seem to be an issue this year.
So to answer your question, yes, Otter Street would like to keep it from getting any bigger. Mainly so they can keep the tourney well organized.
|
|
| |
|
| Good to know that they're keeping an eye on it. I would also have "organizational" concerns if it got much bigger. Does anyone know of a larger walleye tourney? This thing might have become The Grandaddy of Them All, size wise. Also think that the shotgun start by flight should be reexamined. It can get pretty hairy when the flare goes off...even after the extension of the staging area. Would hate to see a bad accident force the change. As they say.....an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 284
| Payout should be increased with more boats, but it is not. |
|
| |
|
| Is that fact? That would explain a willingness to grow the numbers allowed. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 378
Location: Omro,Wi. |
Edited by Hafe 3/9/2005 12:22 PM
|
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 378
Location: Omro,Wi. | I'll agree that the "Shot-Gun" start is a very bad idea.A couple of years back,we actually had a boat run into the back us on take-off.I quess they didn't see the 20' with the 250hp. on it? With the room in the bay,they could very easily let one at a time go.Don't know why they have not done it yet?The last time I fished merc.nationals we left according to numbers.We should bring this up at the meeting. |
|
| |
|
| Received my entry yesterday. I also would like to see the payout increased as they allow more teams in. It would be alot safer if it were a single file start instead of the shotgun they have now. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 617
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin | I heard they had 339 teams and expected a couple more stragglers...
Shotgun start is kinda cool to watch, but it is dangerous. I'd like to see a single file start, but for reasons other than safety... |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 859
Location: Appleton wi | No one says you have to shot gun with everyone. Last year i gave the shotgunners a 20 sec headstart and kinda just layed low didnt have to worry about zig zagging thru everyone.
Team 305
Edited by eye Lunker 3/15/2005 4:02 PM
|
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 378
Location: Omro,Wi. | eye Lunker - 3/9/2005 2:14 PM
No one says you have to shot gun with everyone. Last year i gave the shotgunners a 20 sec headstart and kinda just layed low didnt have to worry about zig zagging thru everyone Exactly what we were doing,waiting,when we got hit.So that doesn't always work,the right way. |
|
| |
