Walleye Discussion Forums

Forums | Calendars | Albums | Quotes | Language | Blogs Search | Statistics | User Listing
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )
View previous thread :: View next thread
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]

Regional Walleye Fishing -> Winnebago Walleyes -> First Walleye with VHS
 
Message Subject: First Walleye with VHS
Mark Komo
Posted 6/26/2007 8:40 PM (#57899)
Subject: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 1195

Location: Orland Park, IL
neighbor got a chunky 22 incher with 2 small bleeding sores just above the belly near the back of the fish. Didnt look too back, but looked really close to the VHS stuff. All our short fish were very clean, just short.

DNR was checking the Pipe launch reviewing fish for the disease on Saturday. He said he got one guy with 3 sauger in the box. Said it was close to a $525 fine due to the sliding scale and being at the top end. (0 sauger bag so 1 sauger = 100% of fine). Seemed like a nice enough guy. He remembered our two fish when we broke for lunch (yep, Pipe Express fried chicken). And said only 8 more, when we came back.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jerry
Posted 6/26/2007 9:09 PM (#57901 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2567

Location: Manitowoc, WI
The only thing worse than the VHS virus is the number of armchair biologists who have reported catching a fish with the VHS virus. Did the DNR official look at the fish and identify the markings as VHS? If he did, what method of evaluation did he use? The only way to find out is to have the fish tested. Until then, it would best serve us to keep opinions to ourselves in order to not create paranoia.

M.Komo I'm not getting down on you. We've shared the boat together and I think you are a great guy. I just think it would be best to learn as much as we can about the disease, do what we can to defeat it or lessen it's effect, and make factual statements about the disease once the facts come in instead of everyone making comments about how many fish they've caught with the virus. To my knowledge, there has not been one walleye found in the Winnebago system at this point to have been positively identified with VHS. Until one is found with VHS I am not going to be gullible and believe all the rumors of fish die-offs and reports of fish being found with VHS not identified by the DNR.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark Komo
Posted 6/26/2007 10:02 PM (#57905 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 1195

Location: Orland Park, IL
Well said Jerry.

Based on the information that has been kinda circulated via the boat dock postings, some dnr information, and essentially what is read here and about, what else can I base this on? Clearly, the education of fisherman related to this menace is lacking to say the least. Was it VHS, not sure. Did it look like it had the symptoms of vhs? Maybe. Is this the first fish I seen up front with something like this? Definately in the last five years of yankin fish out of the winnebago system.

So, take it as you will. This is sore point and not a "chicken little" type statement. Yes, the DNR should keep fisherman up to date on their findings. My concern, as is all, is the impact this will potentially have. Hysteria, or creation there of, isnt on my agenda.

So, perhaps its the manner of information distribution. lots of dead floating sheepshead + walleye + open bloody sores + winnebago = what then.

Thanks for the input, though. And your point is well taken. Like I said kinda looked really close to that stuff.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jerry
Posted 6/26/2007 11:37 PM (#57910 - in reply to #57905)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2567

Location: Manitowoc, WI
No problem buddy. The last thing I want is this to look like I'm getting down on a fellow WF'er.

I hope this thing isn't as widespread and as devastating as is being reported. I agree with the "hope for the best, plan for the worst" strategy when dealing with VHS, as we need to be prepared for what we'll see next spring when the virus will be most lethal.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Concerned
Posted 6/27/2007 6:49 AM (#57915 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


Jerry when was the last time you fished bago? I fish it alot and I think we definitely have a problem out there. I have around 30 plus days on bago this year and have had 17 to 20 of these "virus" looking fish!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Shep
Posted 6/27/2007 8:00 AM (#57916 - in reply to #57915)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 3899

Then it's been in Bago for a lot of years. I've caught fish that have blood on them for years. I know lots of people that have. I have also noticed no more than the usual of floating sheepshead this year.

While I am concerned about what this virus is going to do to the fishery, I also am going to wait to see what the DNR Biologists determine. SO far, they haven't found any eyes with the virus.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jayman
Posted 6/27/2007 8:47 AM (#57918 - in reply to #57916)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 1656

JFS has been around for years on 'Bago........(Jayman Filleting System).

I agree, the DNR annouces VHS and now we have VHS pandomonium on 'Bago and Green Bay. I'm a bit disappointed in the DNR. I think it's important to get as much info together and facts and rpesent it to the public in a way they will understand. Perception is everything.....and right now the perception seems to be far off from the truth.

I'm calling it...VHS will amount to CWD amoung sportsmen, other than it'll create a whole new plethora of pain in the arse rules that diligent sportsmen will follow and the rest of the boating community won't have a clue about.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rich S
Posted 6/27/2007 9:26 AM (#57920 - in reply to #57918)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2300

Location: Berlin
I don't mind the way they did it. It gives everyone a heads up and now the boat launches are not as crowded.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stacker
Posted 6/27/2007 1:20 PM (#57932 - in reply to #57920)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2445

Location: Fremont, Wisconsin
There it is in a nut shell, Jayman. There will be rules that are followed by the fisherman and the rest of the boating world will have no clue.

I sell ski and wakeboard boats. They have tanks like a livewell on them to the weight the boats for a bigger wake. Many a person uses the wolf river chain and then goes back to there lake homes in waupaca and such. They will be transporting just as well as anyone. A while back there was a dnr guy at a boat show that was very curious about the onboard tanks. Him and I talked for months about what could be done to keep there bilges and such clean. He seemed to have lost interest after awhile. Bet he is thinking about it now.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jerry
Posted 6/27/2007 5:58 PM (#57942 - in reply to #57932)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2567

Location: Manitowoc, WI
Concerned,

I was out 10 days ago.....we had around 25 walleyes and some other fish in 5 hrs. I listened the chatter about VHS on Channel 68, hearing one guy after another talk about the walleye they caught with VHS.

Sorry, I'm not believeing it from the amateur biologists.

Signed,

Concerned Too.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sworrall
Posted 6/27/2007 8:57 PM (#57952 - in reply to #57942)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS




Location: Rhinelander
There are several diseases that cause lesions on the side of the fish, and some have been around on Winnebago and the Fox for as long as I can remember. I've caught lots of Green Bay and a few Winnebago system walleyes with those lesions and growths long before any VHS warnings. It's good to be aware, and even better to know exactly what the VHS symptoms look like.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
thumper
Posted 6/28/2007 6:36 AM (#57957 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 744

I'll just throw in my .02.....Before this year when VHS was confirmed to be here, of the hundreds of walleye (or other fish for that matter) I have caught on the Winnebago system, I do not remember ONE that had these sores on it. This year, I have caught at least 10-12 walleye (+ 4 northern) that have had sores that look just like the pictures of confirmed cases of VHS. Not little spots- I mean red sores bigger than a quarter. If it isn't VHS, what a mighty coincidence that another disease with the same symptoms has affected fish so dramatically this year. I am not a biologist, but I like to think I have some common sense. I'm not saying it's the end of walleye fishing as we know it, I'm just saying when I look at the situation logically, it seems pretty obvious.

Dave S

Edited by thumper 6/28/2007 6:37 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark Komo
Posted 6/28/2007 8:10 AM (#57960 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 1195

Location: Orland Park, IL
Thanks for the comments. I think DNR is doing an ok job, but it seems like some momentum has been lost.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Brad B
Posted 6/28/2007 8:36 AM (#57961 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 617

Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
I have to agree with Dave on this one. I do remember catching an occasional walleye with a sore in years past, but never anything like I've seen on a couple of the fish I've caught this year. For the record though, I have yet to see even one dead walleye on the lake, one walleye that was anything other than healthy looking, or even a sheephead that looked like it was on its last legs...

My family and I take walks a few times a week along the shore by the boat launches south of Oshkosh and by Miller's Bay and I haven't noticed any more dead fish (sheephead) than usual. That said, I can't remember a year with so many weeds in the bays and floating around free out in the mud. Perhaps VHS has more of an impact on the weeds than the fish... Viral Hedge Shears?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
thumper
Posted 6/28/2007 9:20 AM (#57965 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 744

Good point. All the "infected" fish I have caught seemed otherwise healthy aside from the sores, and I have seen zero floating dead walleye also. One other thing to note is that I have not seen one sheephead with the sores on it, has anyone else?

Dave S
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rich S
Posted 6/28/2007 9:26 AM (#57966 - in reply to #57965)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2300

Location: Berlin
I have not caught a sheephead this year let alone one with sores on it.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Brad B
Posted 6/28/2007 9:33 AM (#57968 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 617

Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Want me to teach you how?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Shep
Posted 6/28/2007 10:47 AM (#57976 - in reply to #57968)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS



Member

Posts: 3899

Rich,

You don't know what you are missing. I need to get you in the boat with me.

I once fished a lake in Ontario. The resort owner claimed there were no Sheepshead in it. I promptly went out and caught one. He said it must have been a fluke, and the only one in the lake. The next day I caught the same "one". 6 times!

I've been told that if there is a sheepshead in a lake, I would catch it. Whoever said that was a real prophet!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ts_work
Posted 6/28/2007 11:49 AM (#57979 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


I beileve i read that for it to be evan a questionable VHS finding they have to have bloody, bleedy icky mucous membranes.. eyes, mouth, gills, a$$hole. ect..

The reason you guys are noticing more fish with scaley sores is because you are now looking for them.. (virus first appears in mucous membranes, not scaled skin)

Before VHS was found it was consider normal to have marks.. Northern almost always have sores and battle wounds.. its rare to catch one with out.

Now any little nick or mark, "oh my god its VHS ive never cought a fish like this befor.. oh no, we are all going to die..!!!"

I agree with Jerry too many people over anylizing there fish..

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Brad B
Posted 6/28/2007 1:25 PM (#57988 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: Re: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 617

Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
ts_work -

Your entitled to your opinion.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fishnfur
Posted 6/28/2007 2:48 PM (#57992 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


you guys are all in denial. it's here. if you spend any time at all on the lake you will see it. the northern seem to be getting hit pretty hard by the disease. but, i have caught walleye with the disease as well. my partner and i weighed one at walleye weekend with the disease. i believe they had two others with vhs come to the scales as well.

it will be interesting to see what happens this fall. vhs is more active in colder water. we'll have to wait and see...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rich S
Posted 6/28/2007 3:18 PM (#57993 - in reply to #57992)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 2300

Location: Berlin
I guess the real question is: If you have never heard of VHS would you give these fish a second thought.

I have had years where I caught a ton of fish with sores and I have had years where I caught almost none. I personally have not seen this on the fish that I have caught. I have seen other peoples fish (at tournaments) that seem to have the symptoms of sores on the body. I have NOT seen ANY fish with bulging eyes.

The disease is here but like others have said I bet this turns out to be another CWD. I also believe there is some behind the scenes motives for all the hype and if I am right, more power to the DNR.

One last thought. I was checking out a new spot last night and liked the way it looked on the graph. I wanted to really see what it was so I jumped in and walked over it. I was as carefull as can be and I still got cut up on zebra mussels. I am sure the fish have the same problem especially in the shallows when the wind is pounding. Try cutting yourself and letting it stew in lake water, nasty things happen to the smallest of cuts.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Cranky
Posted 6/28/2007 5:04 PM (#57996 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


All I need to say is CWD. How many big fish kill off's did you see in erie? seen none when i was there. Caught lots of fish all looked healthy...So yes we may have it...will it kill everyting off. Probably not. As Jerry said armchair biologists. More rules to abide by. More of a hassle at the boat launch but yet we'll open the lochs. This State always amazes me...I ouv it to hate it...lol
Top of the page Bottom of the page
guest
Posted 6/28/2007 7:07 PM (#57997 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


So fishnfur you caught and weight one at a tournament and you had how many in your live well with the diseases fish? And did they put that one suspected fish in with all the other in the holding tank?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
eye Lunker
Posted 6/28/2007 7:15 PM (#57998 - in reply to #57899)
Subject: RE: First Walleye with VHS


Member

Posts: 859

Location: Appleton wi
I remember kendal saying at spring sheboygan club meeting that infected fish die rather quick after showing symptons and i'm thinking he said within 36hours ? Anyone else remember? Jaymon or Jerry can remember what he said?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete all cookies set by this site)