Walleye Discussion Forums
| ||
View previous thread :: View next thread | |
Jump to page : < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... > Now viewing page 2 [25 messages per page] Walleye Fishing -> General Discussion -> Once was hidden.... |
Message Subject: Once was hidden.... | |||
tyee![]() |
| ||
Shep is starting to talk like RNT, Stacker understands the game will change now and Steve is finally thinkiing about how a "Team" Can be marketed........Yes I too believe that Teams openly discussed... WILL change peoples perception and frankly it might impact the amount of NEW participants coming to the show but will probably strengthen existing players if they can afford to keep playing the game! I wonder if there might be a need for "team rules" finally... ? | |||
| |||
jerry![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2567 Location: Manitowoc, WI | Team rules already exist....but not in a framework that the general public would see. For instance, for the team I fished with we took 20% of each individuals winnings and split them evenly among the four of us. This way it benefits each teammate to share the info, as one teammate might really be sticking them one day and the other cannot buy a bite.....and believe me, it happens!! Also, I can recall spending a portion of my day defending an area where my partners were in the hunt for a win, warding off other competitors and not letting them get close to the bite.....a.k.a. beating off the tailpipers. I made a bunch of friends that day!!! My partners ended up second and fourth so for my day of, for the most part, giving up my tourney I received a little over $3,000. Other rules are a product of a circuit's rules, such as allowed information sharing on the water between competitors. The FLW Tour allowed on wtaer communication for a year or two and we used this liberally. I recall driving right up to one of my partners boat and telling him "purple #5 blade, gold and purple beads with a one ounce inline weight back 40 behind the board" for one event. Hey, if the circuit allows it then go with it. Edited by jerry 8/19/2010 9:09 AM | ||
| |||
stacker![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2445 Location: Fremont, Wisconsin | Team rules already exist....but not in a framework that the general public would see. For instance, for the team I fished with we took 20% of each individuals winnings and split them evenly among the four of us. This way it benefits each teammate to share the info, as one teammate might really be sticking them one day and the other cannot buy a bite.....and believe me, it happens!! These are not teams rules as set forth by the governing body of the event, but personal handshakes from friends on how it all works. Shep, when you stated that the players need to go out and promote the sport more, you were correct, but you been saying that for 10 years. The same ol same ol, keep doing what you been doing and expect something to change mentality. This is not about 1 person now, its about a accepted way of playing the game. | ||
| |||
Jasper![]() |
| ||
"Hey, if the circuit allows it then go with it" Interesting to say the least and perhaps part of the answer to the recent decline in participation as it relates to Walleye Tournaments. | |||
| |||
RBB unloged![]() |
| ||
Jasper, The FLW did away with on the water communication for the 2007 season and beyond. Robert Blosser | |||
| |||
tyee![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 1406 | Jasper, I think a lot of people knew "teams" existed but not in the fashion openly being discussed now here. To me and many I know, fishing is an individual sport. The "team" has always ment (at least to me) pro/co at the upper professional levels in one boat. And in other events it meant the team was your buddy in the same boat with you competing against other boats. I quit fishing tournaments because of what we are talking about today. And the fact that I had to learn this along the way years ago. We are talking about the team of anglers banding together in multiple boats, sharing winnings and even writing contracts amoungst each other. Sharing information with their "local" buddies and guides to get the best advantage they can. EVEN GOING AS FAR AS PROTECTING SPOTS. This happened to me one time when what Jerry did, someone did to me in a 2 day event. A major disapointment for me, I don't remember who it was but it changed my perception of the game and was one of the reasons I no longer play. New TEAM rules need to be established so everyone knows this stuff happens, and they can make the decission to donate or participate! Major sponsors will not endorse a team if there is a chance the playing fiels isn't equal for all.......So for example, how many members can be on a team? Good Luck Tyee | ||
| |||
jerry![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2567 Location: Manitowoc, WI | Allow me to explain the protecting of spots: in my example, the two guys I was protecting the spot for were in 2nd and 4th place of a 4 day event. This happened on DAY 3. Other guys on the circuit followed them to their small isolated spot, trying to move in on their bite. I ran them off and cut them off. It was not a case of guys headed to a spot and someone saving the spot for them. There is a big difference between the two. I was proud of what I did for my partners and if I was fishing a tournament and had little going for me while my partners were doing very well I'd do it again......no question. | ||
| |||
stacker![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2445 Location: Fremont, Wisconsin | jerry - 8/19/2010 2:00 PM Allow me to explain the protecting of spots: in my example, the two guys I was protecting the spot for were in 2nd and 4th place of a 4 day event. This happened on DAY 3. Other guys on the circuit followed them to their small isolated spot, trying to move in on their bite. I ran them off and cut them off. It was not a case of guys headed to a spot and someone saving the spot for them. There is a big difference between the two. I was proud of what I did for my partners and if I was fishing a tournament and had little going for me while my partners were doing very well I'd do it again......no question. This would be why teams had to be acknowledged publicly. If you get in with a group you have body guards? wow. | ||
| |||
GNWC Rookie![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 625 Location: LaCrosse, WI | I've seen this done on many different levels, and I can't say I agree with it, but I do understand why folks do it. I can't even tell you how many times I've prefished a Mississippi River event only to find one of the "Local Legends" best friends parked on a certain wing dam waiting for his buddy to show up. These are the same guys that send their wives/kids/parents/uncles neighbors etc... to buy every Willow Cat in town. I had one of these guys stop and watch me fishing a dam a few years ago and proceed to mark waypoints on his GPS and call his buddy over. Wouldn't you guess it, his buddy who wasn't in the tournament was sitting there the next morning and didn't move until Mr. Big Shot showed up about 5 minutes later. They waved to their buddy said thank you and finished second off that very wing dam. I dislike tailpipers too, but in multi day events your boat order is part of the game. The longer the whole team debate goes on, the less interested I am in high level tournaments. I have no problem with sharing a little info amongst friends but policing the rest of the field for your buddies takes it too far in my opinion. I don't knock Jerry for what he did, he even admitted it helped him make money. But what if one of those guys that you blocked, prefished that spot but your buddies had a better number draw earlier in the event so they beat them there. You could be doing to them, the exact thing you're afraid they're doing to your team. I think we're seeing a transition from testing yourself against the best, to testing the quality of your team. Also I think we're seeing instead of wanting to find new ways to beat the other guys, we see more people trying to figure out how to take something away from them. Call it whatever you like, but it's changing. At least folks are admitting it now. I just don't like the thought of a young 22 year old mortgaging their future on tournaments without knowing what they're getting into. You can tell me they should do their own research, blah blah blah..... The fact of the matter is, if they at least know what they're up against they'll be able to make a better decision. All in all, I do agree that acknowledging it is a step in the right direction. | ||
| |||
Jasper![]() |
| ||
Whether it is right or wrong I will certainly leave that up to you folks. Mr. Blosser indicated that post 2007, FLW went away with sharing information. Again, whether that is wright or wrong I will defer that to everyone else. Personally, I just don't see how it would be rewarding. I sincerely plead this is taken as only a personal observation and nothing else. | |||
| |||
jerry![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2567 Location: Manitowoc, WI | GNWC, The first two days of this event there were three boats there: mine and my two partners boats. NOBODY else was near us. On day three at least 5 boats tried to get in there, as they were following my partner's boats. I was the first boat there that day and watched it all happen. The examples you give are NOTHING SIMILAR to what I am speaking of. There wasn't anyone there for two days except us. We did not ask someone who was not in the tourney to go hold the spot for us......WE TOOK CARE OF IT OURSELVES!! I had two of these guys come up to me afterward and they weren't happy. Neither of them indicated that they were ever in this spot. I made it clear to both of them that I was pleased with what I did and that I would do it again if necessary. That was the end of discussion. | ||
| |||
GNWC Rookie![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 625 Location: LaCrosse, WI | I'm not trying to say you did anything wrong, I'm just saying, I've seen the other side of it as well. It happens, there's no denying that. My whole point is, people take it too far and are willing to intentionally screw somebody else over to get ahead. The team aspect just makes it look worse. It may not be a result of teams, but when two or more boats are working together it looks bad. As for tailpipers, we all know who they are and we all know they suck. Most of them are tailpipers because they can't do it on their own. That's a whole other issue. I do appreciate folks stepping forward and bringing it to light. Like I said in my last post, as long as we know what really goes on, it helps in the decision making process. | ||
| |||
jerry![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2567 Location: Manitowoc, WI | No problem GNWC.....we're on the same page. | ||
| |||
620![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 397 Location: Badgerland | jerry - 8/19/2010 5:36 PM No problem GNWC.....we're on the same page. "LIKE" | ||
| |||
LurePresentation![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 132 | Does KVD belong to a team? | ||
| |||
tyee![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 1406 | Jerry I'm not saying you did anything wrong either. Only that I didn't know of these things when I started and it turned me off. GNWC mentions many things about "possible team" members and that behavior is atrocious but happens in many lower level events and is nearly impossible to stop. All I am saying now is that I don't think the founding farthers/tournament directors ever considered drafting rules for this type of team before and that if it is to continue it needs to be addresed possibly with rules that level the playing field for everyone, including the 20 year old that mortgages his house to live his dream. Good Luck Tyee | ||
| |||
budsbud66![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 344 Location: Manitowoc WI | yikes this topic has been beat over and over! Edited by budsbud66 8/19/2010 9:40 PM | ||
| |||
Shep![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 3899 | stacker - 8/19/2010 10:10 AM Team rules already exist....but not in a framework that the general public would see. For instance, for the team I fished with we took 20% of each individuals winnings and split them evenly among the four of us. This way it benefits each teammate to share the info, as one teammate might really be sticking them one day and the other cannot buy a bite.....and believe me, it happens!! These are not teams rules as set forth by the governing body of the event, but personal handshakes from friends on how it all works. Shep, when you stated that the players need to go out and promote the sport more, you were correct, but you been saying that for 10 years. The same ol same ol, keep doing what you been doing and expect something to change mentality. This is not about 1 person now, its about a accepted way of playing the game. Not 10 years, but maybe 5. And I never, ever said just the anglers need to promote just themselves. Yep, same ol Stacker, interpretting something incorrectly to suit what he's saying. It's never been about one person, and I never, ever said it was. Tyee comparing me to RNT. Now THAT is funny. So Stacker, you are saying that a governing body, AIM for instance, should determine how teams operate? AIM is going tell jerry, his team can share only X% of their winnings. And how many members can make up a team? And what kind of boats they must all have, and motors, electronics, etc? How about who prefishes when and where? Teams are not going to go away. And OK, maybe now that they are "officially"outed, maybe things will change. but I've said it before. The changes that are going to happen in pro walleye tourneys were going to happen, irregardless that Gary Parson, and Perry Good came out and mentioned the T word. And one other thing. Anyone who thinks these guys are in it soley to satisfy their own competetive juices? Um, no. It's about the money. Always has been, always will be. To think otherwise is naive. The 20 yr old that mortgages his house to live that dream? He's a fool, and deserves what he gets. As for the sharing of information? The FLW didn't regulate against sharing information overall. Just added the face to face "on the water verbal communication", in addition to the no cell phones, and radio communication. But that doesn't stop the teams from communicationg in other ways. Hand signals, body language, pulling a bait from the water, not showing up at pre-arranged times and places, drive bye's, etc. I hope you are all correwct in believing that formally sanctioned teams are around the corner, and that is the key to growing the sport. But it isn't going to happen with out non-endemic sponsorship money, and lot's of promotion....by the tournament organizations, the individual anglers, and the sponsors to be. It will need massive traditional media coverage, not just that provided by an internet site or two. Edited by Shep 8/20/2010 9:09 AM | ||
| |||
stacker![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2445 Location: Fremont, Wisconsin | OK I am tired. Jerry is out ther playing offensive tackle for his team, to make 3k in something that cost him close to that to play. Shep wants everything he has always wanted and thats for everyone to promote the sport and get the "Non-Endemics" involved. Of course as you all know I still need to take classes at night to know what I am reading. I have heard it so many times I know what it is going to say before I do Shep say its all about the money. He is right but he does not know why he is right. Here is why, When lindners started this pro-am world it was to promote there in fisherman magazine and way of life and to make MONEY. The fisherman were mainly guides who would use a win to promote there business and make MONEY. The resat of the fisherman also used the wins to promote products and make MONEY. Fellegy will tell ya teams been around from the start as I am sure he is right and he will also say the fisherman got screwed because the promoters never delivered to them on the promises made. Thats another fight you wont hear about till someone is on there death bed. ENTER: FLW and astronomical pay days. Walleye guys are hicks, many never seen college, but they fish well. They know one thing, 300k 400k 100k is one hell of alot of money. FLW Was the start of the organized crime. The posse lead the way. They did it well and took lots of cash that was on the table. Nothing against that crew, you played by the rules. Sponsors, hmmmmm...... who won that event, shoot, I dont know, he is part of the posse, do we want to be a part of that, hmmm.... lets sit back and watch...... oh what did I see? There main sponsors are also the main sponsors of the FLW. Where would I fit in if I do not want to play with Walmart? also, Theres Jerry blocking guys so him and his get a piece of the kingdom, now it just gets greedier. Like it or not, that is a very quick run down of the last 20 years, the next 20 can change. | ||
| |||
Sunshine![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2393 Location: Waukesha Wisconsin | ........As for tailpipers, we all know who they are and we all know they suck. Most of them are tailpipers because they can't do it on their own. That's a whole other issue.
I totally agree, that these are 2 separate issues. I hope we keep them separate. I will repeat what I have suggested years ago. Submit gps waypoints prior to take off. If you ‘happen to find” others number 1 spot during tournament hours too bad and too sad.
......“I don't think the founding farthers/tournament directors ever considered drafting rules for this type of team before and that if it is to continue it needs to be addressed possibly with rules that level the playing field for everyone, including the 20 year old that mortgages his house to live his dream.”
LOL, many of the “founding fathers were on the same team.
..........And one other thing. Anyone who thinks these guys are in it soley to satisfy their own competitive juices? Um, no. It's about the money. Always has been, always will be. To think otherwise is naive. The 20 yr old that mortgages his house to live that dream? He's a fool, and deserves what he gets.
Yes, it is about the money. Always has been however it is done to stimulate those competitive juices too. As far as the 20 year old comment, The NPAA and the tournaments themselves need to do a better job of educating the young od the sport. If they die financially the sport suffers too.
........FLW was the start of the organized crime. The posse lead the way. They did it well and took lots of cash that was on the table. Nothing against that crew, you played by the rules.
That is a very negative statement followed by a disclaimer that you have nothing against them and they played by the rules. I for one do not believe that the FLW was the start of the organized crime. What happened was people took it very serious and read the rules as all “pro’s” should do. They asked questions and did things that the rules allowed that others did not think of. They have actually done more for the sport than most because of their “lawyering” of the rules. Many positive changes have occurred because of their questions, interpretations, and delivery. We do morph as a sport and they were a part of many rule interpretations that have been changed, questioned or qualified.
We all make decisions in business. Play by their rules or look elsewhere. Thankfully AIM allows you to make choices.
........also, There’s Jerry blocking guys so him and his get a piece of the kingdom, now it just gets greedier.
Jerry did nothing wrong and I am glad that the tailpipers of the world had someone stand up to them. Many of us could tell horrendous stories of tailpiping especially when 300k to 400k are on the line. I have seen the posse be negatively impacted by the hounds that followed them to the Promised Land. And unfortunately, we are not just talking about a few. The only thing Jerry did wrong was include this antidote into the conversation. IMHO, it should be separated from the original conversation.
.........So Stacker, you are saying that a governing body, AIM for instance, should determine how teams operate? AIM is going tell jerry, his team can share only X% of their winnings. And how many members can make up a team? And what kind of boats they must all have, and motors, electronics, etc? How about who prefishes when and where?
Yes Shep, the organization can make rules on team participation if they choose. They can make more decisions than you aor I may want, need or desire. No, they can’t tell how to run/do some specific things behind closed doors. But they certainly cam change a the major make-up of team organization if they choose.
I for one would be delighted to be a part of the organized Posse Team or the KP Team. The future will be interesting.
If you respond (we always know Stacker does lol), I’m off for 5 days of fishing, Not ignoring you if you call me out.
Edited by Sunshine 8/20/2010 11:10 AM | ||
| |||
Jasper![]() |
| ||
Just curious..... Prior to 2007, in the FLW, was language written into the rules stating that you could not follow a competitor.... A.K.A. Tailpiping? | |||
| |||
Sunshine![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2393 Location: Waukesha Wisconsin | Well ........................
Jerry shared a story so i will too. The short answer is that I know there was no rule in 2001. And as a "boater" in 2006 through 2008, I do not recall any specific language to tailpiping. Unfortunately i did not keep the rules from back then.
I can tell you a quick story from a situation that would be an hour conversation. It was 2001 on Green bay for the RCL (prior to FLW name change) Championship. $400,00 was at stake.
The posse was on very big fish at the Green Island area. The team brought in 26 to 32 pounds of fish to the scales. There were no more than 7-8 boats in this area on day 1 (4 of the boats being from 1 team). I was a co-angler for this event and was doing cartwheels because I drew Tom Keenan for day 2. (I believe the day 1 leader). Tommy had left and I stuck around the weigh-in area. Much to my surprise, many (and I mean many) of the "Pro's were talking that they were heading out the promised land of Green Island to follow the leaders. I don't know how (but I speculate a co-angler spilled his guts) but they all knew the program and location. I called Tommy on the phone to report what i was hearing about the "tailpipers".
His first reaction was NO WAY. I then preceded to tell him his whole program. I knew specific location, depth, lures and colors. Just by listening to the crowd. I prefer not to go into any great detail on the conversation(s) we had and with his team.
I was with Tommy when he talked to Sonny Renolds the next morning. Tommy explained the situation. Sonny's only suggestion was to throw out a buoy. Rules stated that contestants had to stay a certain distance away from a competitor's buoy. Tommy explained that this would not work because he was trolling an area. Sonny's reply was to throw out 2 buoys. What I witnessed this day upset my stomach and mental health. I counted 40 boats on the spot. please believe me, I personally counted 40 boats. It was joke! I witnessed people cutting other people off (not a Jerry tactic but through stupidity). I witnessed boat so close together that they were getting their lines tangled together. At one point we watched to "Pro's" fighting what they thought was a big fish until they realized they were tangles with each other going in opposite directions.
What should have been a great day with a great Pro and friend turned into a nightmare. We caught one fish before we gave up and went to the river to try and salvage the day.
Not the fondness of memories about Tournament fishing.
| ||
| |||
stacker![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2445 Location: Fremont, Wisconsin | Here you go sunshine. Anyone who has fished a 2 day tourney can attest to this happening. It is not to say that its right or wrong. cabelas on green bay had this exact same thing go from 6 to 25 boats the second day and many of the NEW boats were people you know very well. But that was not the question was it. No, tailpiping has never been a rule. | ||
| |||
Johnny V![]() |
| ||
You can't throw all anglers into a pile and say, thay all act this way. Jerry, I totally agree with what you did. There is a huge differnce between someone that has prefished the spot, and showing up on the second or third day of the tournament, and I will guarantee you the people fishing there will have known if they prefished that spot or not, compared to some joker that can't find fish on his own and is just moving in, knowing that the people fishing there are doing well. Enough on that. A perfect example is last year at AIM's championship at Winnie, everyone knew where Todd Rielly was fishing and they respected him enough to give him and a few others the sopt. I was lucky enough to fish with someone from that group of anglers, and on the way out he told me flat out, there are three other boats on the same area that have been fishing there, sure enough, there were three other boats there, (this was on the last day) soon a couple of other boats tried to sneek in there, havn't been there all week, but came flying right up to the spot, and it didn't take long for that boat to move off, because they soon realized he was not making any friends. I am assuming that everyone on the site has met and talked to Gary Parsons, because his name seems to always come up. I have had the priviledge to meet Gary and have talked to him a couple of times, and in my opinion, he tells it like it is and most of you don't like it. He called you whiners out in Green Bay, if you think you are all good fisherman - "put your money up and give it a go". If you talk with Gary or Keith or most of the other pros, team or not, I don't believe it is entirely about the money (you have to already have money to play at this level) - yes for some it is - but these guys have a passion for the sport of walleye fishing - coming up with new inovations for each of us to use. And there is nothing wrong with a little compitition and bragging rights. Lets face it, how many of you have went out and bought some slow death hooks, or the many other products that have evolved from tournament fishing. On the last day of the AIM tournaments, the pros tell there secrets to the audience so everyone listening can go out and tell you what they were catching thier fish on and even where they were. So are the 50+ fisherman all on the same team for sharing? Who cares if you are on a 2 person team or a 10 person team, you still need to make decisions on the water. | |||
| |||
Sunshine![]() |
| ||
Member Posts: 2393 Location: Waukesha Wisconsin | Johnny V - 8/20/2010 1:07 PM You can't throw all anglers into a pile and say, thay all act this way.
I am assuming that everyone on the site has met and talked to Gary Parsons, because his name seems to always come up. I have had the priviledge to meet Gary and have talked to him a couple of times, and in my opinion, he tells it like it is and most of you don't like it. He called you whiners out in Green Bay, if you think you are all good fisherman - "put your money up and give it a go".
hmmmmmmm...............
Johnny V, I'm not sure who you are directing these statements to but I don't believe anyone is lumping all anglers together. We all know there are bad apples and more than we would hope for.
I think you are the one lumping people together (the Gary quote). I'm not sure how well you know most of the people responding to this thread? I know many of them personally for quite a few years now. I assure you that they are NOT whiners AND they HAVE put their money where their mouth is. And they (we) have been doing it for a very long time. Not all at the highest level, but many of us. I think many responding have paid our dues long enough to be entitled to an opinion on the subject. Yes, I know Gary and I believe i will ask him if he thinks I am a whiner the next time we meet. ROTFLMAO After being a part of and listening to several conversations (and email) about tournament fishing with Gary and Kieth I believe we agree about most of this content. | ||
| |||
Jump to page : < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... > Now viewing page 2 [25 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
News | Video | Audio | Chat | Forums | Rankings | Big Fish | Sponsors | Classified Boat Ads | Tournaments | FAQ's