|
|
Location: Rhinelander | Updated today, take a look.
http://walleye.outdoorsfirst.com/rankings.asp |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 2567
Location: Manitowoc, WI | Okay, I'm confused. I was ranked 179 before and I finished 21st at CLeveland, which replaces a near last place fisnish from Winnebago a couple of years ago. Seems as though I've disappeared completely from the ranks. How do these rankings work? Also, why isn't my partner Pat Schuette in the rankings yet? He has two full years of PWT experience and in those years finished in the upper half of the field each time. Are these just oversights? |
|
| |
|
Location: Rhinelander | Jerry,
You fell under the minimum number of circuit events to be ranked. I believe Pat Schuette is going to make the Rankings at the next update. |
|
| |
|
| Cool!!! Only 127 more places to go!!  LOL
Started the year out in 171st. |
|
| |
|
| I have been looking at the individual stats, it's interesing to see what each fisherperson has done. This is 24 months running, right? How many tournaments does it take in that time to qualify for a ranking? It looks like 6 or more. |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 1382
| Jerry, here's a link which explains the system and some of the issues involved. Be sure to read closely paragraph three. This is your chance to voice your opinion on the eligibility requirements.
http://walleye.outdoorsfirst.com/rankings_about.asp |
|
| |
|
| How does the WWR take into account field size? A "money finish" in an RCL event different between the two also.
My question is if you finish 120th in a PWT event you were last. If you finish 120th in a RCL event you may have beat 55 other anglers. Does the WWR account for this? |
|
| |
|
Member
Posts: 1382
| Yes. |
|
| |
